Buffalo Breeze
BuffaloBreeze.com Friday 10th February 2012 Volume 0606/10
Follow us on Follow us on TwitterFollow us on facebook








  • More World News

  • China manufacturing hubs see less profits
  • Rhino mother, baby killed in South Africa
  • China to auction seized assets online
  • Kellan Lutz wants more 'Twilight' film
  • Iran mulls base to launch bigger satellites
  • Iran adds two submarines to naval fleet
  • Spanish photographer wins world press photo award
  • South Korean tourists abducted in Egypt
  • UN chief seeks to ease Falkland tensions
  • Oscar is boring: Dustin Hoffman
  • US stocks drop on Greece worries
    Get World News headlines emailed to you daily.

    Lindsay Lohan demands $100 mn over 'milkaholic' ad
    Buffalo Breeze
    Tuesday 9th March, 2010  
    (IANS)


    Troubled actress Lindsay Lohan may not be getting the plum film roles anymore, but she might bring in millions in a lawsuit over a widely viewed television ad.

    Lohan, 23, has sued online brokerage E-Trade for $100 million alleging that a company ad in which a baby named Lindsay is referred to as a 'milkaholic' violated her rights, according to the New York Post Tuesday.

    The ad debuted during the Super Bowl in February and featured a baby boy apologising to his girlfriend for standing her up because he was too busy trading shares. 'And that milkaholic Lindsay wasn't over?' the baby girl asks before another baby girl pops into the screen saying, 'Milk-a-whaaat?' It was the latest in a series of ads featuring the babies in a bid to show the ease of the online trading system.

    In the lawsuit filed Monday, Lohan's lawyer said the ad was a clear reference to her client, who has a dismal record of substance abuse.

    'Many celebrities are known by one name only, and E-Trade is using that knowledge to profit,' Lohan's lawyer, Stephanie Ovadia, said in a statement. 'They're using her name as a parody of her life. Why didn't they use the name Susan? This is a subliminal message. Everybody's talking about it and saying it's Lindsay Lohan.'

    A statement from the ad agency that produced the commercial denied that it was referring to Lohan, and said they 'just used a popular baby name that happened to be the name of someone on the account team'.


      Email this story to a friend

    Have your say on this story

    Your nickname (required)
    Message